Showing posts with label emotional intelligence coaching for lawyers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label emotional intelligence coaching for lawyers. Show all posts

Saturday, November 22, 2008

The Makings of a Teacher: Ray Garrett, Jr., Chairman, SEC




Ray Garrett Jr. served as Chairman of the SEC, 1973-75. We plan to have a table for him, and commemorative page honoring him in the program at the SEC's 75th Anniversary Celebration Dinner for the Securities Exchange Commission, June 25, 2009.

Let us know of your interest in participating. Email me at sdunn@susandunn.cc .
----------------
In October 26, 1974, Ray Garrett, Jr. gave a speech at the Dean's Day Program of the NY University Law School, where he received the Distinguished Citizen Award. Ray Garrett Jr. had taught there in the summer of 1950.

"LIFE BEGINS AT FORTY"
THE OPENING PAGES OF THIS SPEECH AND OTHERS, GIVING A PERSONAL IMPRESSION OF RAY GARRETT, JR., HAVE BEEN GRACIOUSLY PROVIDED BY HARVEY L. PITT.

An Address by
Ray Garrett, Jr., Chairman
Securities and Exchange Commission

Presented before
DEAN'S DAY PROGRAM
New York University Law School
Distinguished Citizen Award
October 26, 1974
New York City

This is a time for remembrance for me. My inclination to reminisce could easily exceed your tolerance, and I do not intend to search the limits of the latter. But I cannot stand here this afternoon, having received this most gratifying honor, without being full of recollections of my brief but rewarding formal association with New York University Law School.

I came down here from Cambridge in July, 1950, as the direct result of the persuasive powers of then Dean Russell Niles. I had stayed on a fourth year at Harvard as a teaching fellow, participating in the development of its group work program for first year law students. Dean Niles was interested in a similar program here, and I therefore had an attraction to him for that purpose. Furthermore, he was offering the then generous salary of $5,000 for the year, plus the opportunity to earn extras. With three small children, my wife and I could not afford to be indifferent to money.

We settled in the original Levittown, where some of my classmates were already living [there], and I made the acquaintance of the Long Island Railroad and commuting from Wantaugh. To help pay for the move, I was allowed to take over the second half of the summer night school course on civil procedure -- my half to be code pleading. Since that subject had produced my lowest mark as a student, the assignment was a challenging one such as only a hungry man with a hungry family would accept.

The course was scheduled for two nights a week in the old loft building around the corner. The older gentleman who had taught common law pleading for the first half of the summer, and who obviously had a strong distaste for such irresponsible innovations as code pleading and young squirts, introduced me to the class with that charming observation that you can always tell a Harvard man but you can't tell him much, and mercifully disappeared -- from my sight if not from my memory. Whereupon the class talked me into collapsing our two nightly sessions into one night a week for three hours.

So I began my formal teaching experience talking from seven to ten p.m. on sultry August nights on a subject that I had scarcely mastered, to 20 or 30 sleepy people, in a dreary room on the eighth floor of the old building with no air conditioning, and all the sounds and smells and soot blowing in through the open window. It was not the best way to teach or learn the law, but it was an effective test of stamina, and it made what came afterwards comparatively easy.

My first regular course for the day students came in the fall, and the subject was contracts -- something I felt more comfortable with than procedure. Here I thought I could start some kids off right with the tough Socratic method. Our first case was Hawkins v. McGee, of loving memory to a generation of law students weaned on Professor Fuller's casebook**, and I called on some poor, miserable soul toward the back of the large class to state the case. Naturally, everything he said was wrong and much of it foolish, which I made very clear to the class as I kept him nakedly exposed and suffering for half the period.

When it was over, I returned to my office in glowing satisfaction at such a fine beginning. Shortly afterwards, then Associate Dean Ralph Bischof invited me down to his office to discuss my first class and how it had gone. I gave him a glorious report which he listened to patiently and then said, "Ray, that first-year student has just left here and won't be back. He just resigned, saying he didn't come here to be embarrassed and publicly insulted."

"Well, Dean," I said, "with such a thin skin he probably would never make it as a lawyer."

"Possibly," replied Ralph, "but Ray, he was a Phi Beta in Philosophy from Columbia and had a very high LSAT score. Please don't scare away all of our more promising students."

It's awful what young and inexperienced teachers can do. No one had really ever been that cruel to me, and I was ashamed. I have often wished since then that young man has found a rewarding life elsewhere and has been able to forgive me.

That was all in the old building. The next year we moved to the new. No one who did not live through the transition can quite appreciate the excitement it produced. It was far more than an improvement in physical comfort. It brought with it the promise of great things to come, and they have come. I left for the practice in Chicago the next year, so I didn't stay around to help very long, but the school has become everything that Arthur Vanderbilt....

For full speech go HERE or copy and paste:
http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/1974/102674garrett.pdf

**From a blog about The Paperchase:

Who Was the Basis for Professor Kingsfield? (from Todd)

Can anyone tell me who was the basis for Professor Kingsfield's character in "The Paper Chase"? Kingsfield, of course, does the famous "hairy hand" case of Hawkins v. McGee in the first day of class. So presumably he is using Fuller's casebook on contracts, which as I understand it, used to begin with remedies. To the best of my knowledge during that age, Fuller's casebook was the only one that began with remedies. Did all Contracts professors at Harvard used Fuller's casebook during that era? ...So I assume hat Kingsfield was using Fuller's casebook, but was Fuller the inspiration for Kingsfield's character? See rest of the string HERE.

Ray Garrett, Jr. went on to become a wonderful teacher (ask me, his daughter) ... "While Ray was achieving greatness, he simultaneously taught the rest of us with a kind, measured demeanor. Few men possess such rare abilities and fewer still choose to employ them." (Jim Reynolds, American Bakeries Company)

Ray Garrett was known for his emotional intelligence.

"Ray was infected with the notion that collegiality was something to be sought." (Al Sommers)

ON CHOOSING AN SEC CHAIRMAN: Ray Garrett, Jr., a healer and a consensus builder

'You want someone who is technically proficient,' said Joel Seligman, the dean of the Washington University law school in St. Louis and a historian of the S.E.C. 'This is a very hard job to learn.'

Mr. Seligman pointed to the 1973 appointment of Ray Garrett Jr., a highly respected securities lawyer, after his predecessor, G. Bradford Cook, was forced out as a result of a scandal that made his honesty suspect. 'That is the kind of person you want, probably someone with an accomplished career in securities law, someone who will be a healer and a consensus builder,' Mr. Seligman said...."

Contact Susan Garrett Dunn, sdunn@susandunn.cc for more information. See memorial website here by his daughter, Nancy: http://www.theintrovertzcoach.com/rgj.html .

Add to My Yahoo!

Thursday, December 21, 2006

White Shoe Lawyer and Emotional Intelligence


EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE & THE LAW and the White Shoe Lawyer

Not considered too highly in "the law" or by most lawyers, emotions are nevertheless present in a law firm, and in the courtroom, as they are everywhere else. Emotional Intelligence is particularly needed in working juries. As has been said, "all it takes to hang a jury is two beautiful women or two alcoholics."

Juries also are known not to like "arrogant" attorneys.

Well, today we find on the blog "Law and More: Deconstructing What Happens in Law," an article entitled, "White Shoe in Era of Everyman." We learn that Time has named US, "everyman" the Man of the Year, and that a "white shoe" lawyer originally referred to the "socially ambitious and socially smug" gentlemen (no women in law back then, folks) who were the uppercrust at the Ivy League colleges in the 40s and early 50s.

According to Fred Shapiro, librarian at Yale Law School,

"The term 'white shoe' appears to have originated at Ivy League colleges. The Harvard Crimson, May 9, 1949, refers to a film shown by the Harvard Film Society as doing 'a roaring white-shoe trade' at the box office. . . . An article in Esquire, Sept. 1953, explained that at Yale students were pigeonholed as White Shoe, Brown Shoe, or Black Shoe: 'White Shoe applies primarily to the socially ambitious and socially smug types.' Traditionally white shoes had been prominent in upper-class casual fashion.

In another time, one might say the white shoes were the upper class, or the elite.

This to me is a better explanation, written by a blog commentator: "Ah, 'white shoe' -- we always heard back in the early '80s that the term came from the fact that white bucks were the traditional summer shoes worn by arch-WASP lawyers with their seersucker suits in the days before air-conditioning in New York, Boston and Philadephia firms."
Let me add Chicago to that, and personal anecdote. My father went off to work in the Loop every day in those white shoes and a seersucker suit (and a HAT) even apres A/C. He went to Yale, then Harvard Law school in the late 40s, was a senior partner in a major Chicago law firm, and eventually became Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) - Ray Garrett, Jr. (See Ray Garrett Jr. Corporate and Securities Law Institute, Northwestern School of Law.)

In fact in this photo, which I think was on the cover of Forbes magazine, he has on that seesucker suit, and the white bucks always accompanied it. Until Labor Day.

Blogger, Jane Genova, admits to a bias (she fought her way "in" and then scrambled back out), but she feels that white shoe law firms are missing the boat in recruiting in only Ivy League schools. "Can a hustler with high social/emotional intelligence from a third-tier law school bring in more business, win more cases, get superior results for clients?" she asks. And "of course," she answers herself.

Whoa there. Always? Of course NOT. Only? No. Sometimes? Sure, why not, all thing's being equal? And here's why.
Pertinent to emotional intelligence: It's been said that IQ is what gets you through school, but EQ is what gets you through life. The true "rainmaker" is a maverick, charismatic breed that can't really be pigeonholed. Often brilliant in the law, of course (note that "school" comes before "life"), but there has to be something else, because not all brilliant graduates from Harvard or Stanford are rainmakers. Emotional intelligence subsumes such things as "charisma" and "leadership." My dad had both, and rainmaker he was; his smile lit up a room, his laugh made him the best audience a person could have, and whenever he walked through the law firm the summer I worked there, he was surrounded by a coterie of young associates satelliting around him, wanting to be ... well, led.

Yes, despite the obfuscation of some business consultants and coaches, I maintain that the sine qua non of the leader is that people want to follow him or her. And "want to" is about feeling, not thinking.

I coach leadership, I study it, I had a great role model. Yes, I tried to figure out why Dad had what he had, got what he got and where he got, and it breaks down to many of the emotional intelligence components I teach. However, he was also an exceptional lawyer. But remember, it's not about getting people to follow you, it's about getting them to WANT to follow you.
Now, back to our blogger.

JURIES DON'T LIKE POMPOUS and POMPOUS IS NOT EQ

"When I interviewed the jury in the Rhode Island lead paint trial," writes Ms. Genova, they used words like 'pompous' to describe certain legal players in the trial who screamed white shoe branding. The jurors praised Everyman attorney John Tarantino, defense attorney for ARCO and a local boy. It was Tarantino and only Tarantino who got his client acquitted by that jury. The other three defendants were convicted. This should make all law firms consider, just consider, that maybe all the attributes of the white shoe have become liabilities not the crown jewels of the brand. "
Well, only if the white shoe lawyer happens to be pompous as well, or if that quality is built into your definition of "white shoe lawyer."

OK, she's made her point, and I'll make mine: white shoe, brown shoe, black, or everyman, emotional intelligence can make the crucial difference in one's success in life and at work.

Why debate whether a white shoe or third-tier hustler can win clients and cases for law firms when obviously both are capable of it ... IF they have emotional intelligence.
WANT THE EDGE FOR 2007? SIGN UP FOR EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE COACHING NOW. START AFTER THE FIRST OF THE YEAR. Mailto:sdunn@susandunn.cc.